Showing posts with label evan lysacek. Show all posts
Showing posts with label evan lysacek. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Unfortunately It's All About Hate and Ignorance... (Repost)

May 23, 2011 Update: Nash voices support for gay marriage

Phoenix Suns star Steve Nash, who is quoted in this Blog below for being one of the few professional athletes who have publicly stated they would have no problem playing against or being teammates with openly gay players, has spoken out in favor of gay marriage in a video released today by the Washington, D.C.-based Human Rights Campaign (HRC).

Nash's decision to join the campaign follows in the footsteps of New York Rangers forward Sean Avery, who also appeared in a video for the HRC earlier this month; and it also comes one week after Suns CEO Rick Welts revealed he is gay.

Added January 27, 2011:
Mick Molloy rejects homophobic claims  Mick Molloy is one of the Australian DJs who made 'homophobic' comments about Johnny Weir during the Vancouver Olympics.

Added December 24, 2010:
Quebec DJ censured for gay comments

CBSC Releases Decision Concerning Comments About Figure Skaters

Both of these articles discuss the outcome of complaints filed against Quebec broadcasters Claude Mailhot and Alain Goldberg.  The Canadian Broadcast Standards Council's Quebec Regional Panel noted that "There would certainly have been better, safer, more tasteful ways for the broadcasters to have had their discussion on that subject [Weir's costume and performance]," but the Panel concluded that the comments were not particularly negative and certainly not abusive on the basis of sexual orientation, as would be required to breach the Human Rights Clauses of the Canadian Association of Broadcasters' (CAB) Code of Ethics and Equitable Portrayal Code.  The Panel also observed that the list of identifiable groups in those clauses does not extend to sports figures or athletes. 

The Panel reached a different conclusion with respect to the comments made on Dupont le midi, a radio broadcast hosted by DJ Stéphane Dupont. (This is an incident I had not previously know about until I read these two articles.)  On February 19, 2010, host Stéphane Dupont stated that he could not understand why Mailhot and Goldberg's comments had generated so much controversy because they had merely pointed out that there was [translation] "a queer in a sport for queers" ["un fif dans un sport de fifs"]. Dupont repeatedly used the words "fif" and "tapette" ["queer" and "fag"] to describe homosexuals in a derogatory tone throughout the discussion. The CBSC again received a complaint from the QCGL and a different individual audience member, both alleging that the comments were discriminatory.

The Quebec Panel found a violation of the Human Rights Clauses in this case because "the words and phrases and the tone of the host in enunciating them were scornful, derisive and denigrating."

Added December 12, 2010:
Here's Johnny (This article was one of several written about Johnny in relation to his recent trip to Melbourne, Australia where he performed in three shows.  The article discusses the comments made about him by both the Australian broadcasters and the Quebec broadcasters.)

Added December 4, 2010:
Sports, gender, questions and hate: From Caster Semenya to Lana Lawless, athletics figures out the future
This is a well-written article that discusses gender issues in sports, and tactfully includes Johnny Weir along with others.

++++

This is a repost of my August, 17 2010 Blog Unfortunately Its All About Hate And Ignorance

Despite the fact that I joined up with the Matthew Shepard Foundation and receive their newsletter, I somehow let the fact October 12th is the twelve year anniversary of Matthew's murder get by me.  (He was attacked on October 7th and left to die.  He was found eighteen hours later and died in the hospital on October 12th without ever regaining consciousness.)  Since along with Billy Van Raaphorst and Johnny Weir Matthew was mentioned in this Blog, I decided to go ahead and repost it.  Other than correcting a few small grammatical mistakes, updating the number of Twitter followers, adding one photograph, linking to some recent incidents and fixing a broken link, it is the same Blog.  I did not bring the comments on the original Blog over to this one; therefore, if you are interested in reading the comments on my original posting please follow this link!

Also consider visiting my Blogs A Follow Up to Some Recent Blogs…  and Johnny Weir: A Man Amongst Men

++++
I touch briefly on a very important (to me at least) issue that I take seriously in Chapter Twenty-Three of my FanFic 'A Force of Nature: Part II'.  This story is one of my eight 'Criminal Minds' related FanFiction stories that focus on the character of Spencer Reid.  The story is posted on my page at FanFiction.net.  The issue is the treatment of gays in sports, and also in life in general. 

We hear about tragic incidents such as the murder of Matthew Shepard; a twenty-one year old gay man who had his whole life in front of him.  Matthew was attacked October 7, 1998 by Aaron McKinney and Russell Henderson for no reason other than he was a gay man.  I do not believe I need to go into the details of this wonderful young man's brutal murder to get the point across his tragic death stands as an example of the homophobic idiocy of a segment of the population.  Matthew's parents Judy and Dennis have attempted to make sense of their son's death by creating a foundation in his name.  Judy has also written ‘The Meaning of Matthew: My Son’s Murder in Laramie, and a World Transformed’; a book about her son's life and death, and the changes she believes have come about since people found it acceptable to show up at her son's funeral with signs containing hateful slogans such as  'God Hates Fags' and 'Fag Matt Burn In Hell'.  The same group also showed up at a hearing for Russell Henderson carrying signs with similar slogans, but was met by peaceful counter demonstrators. 

Despite the morons who claim Matthew deserved to die because he was gay, I remember a number of Wyoming residents coming forward in an attempt to let the world know not everyone who lived in the state where Matthew was murdered were of the same opinion.  Matthew's own parents stated their son would "emphasize he does not want the horrible actions of a few very disturbed individuals to mar the fine reputations of Laramie or the university."  Dennis Shepard reportedly relayed through Wyoming governor Jim Geringer, that he did not want his son's death to become "a media circus" and that "we should not use Matt to further an agenda."  Personally I feel like crying every time I think of this young man's tragic death.

Matthew Shepard is only one example of a gay or lesbian person who was attacked, beaten or murdered simply because they were gay.  It happens far too often in the United States (and there have been a number of recent hate crimes against gays reported in the U.S.A.).  Or course it happens other places as well; for example two teenage boys were recently executed in Iran for the 'sin of being gay'.  However, I can speak far more knowledgeably regarding what I observe in my own society, and about the encounters I have online and in everyday life. 

There are three recent incidents that have prompted me to finally write this Blog.  Neither of these incidents resulted in any physical violence; they involved verbal insults, homophobic slurs and the questioning of an athlete's gender.  I would like to state at this point in time questioning a person's gender is not the same as questioning whether a person is gay or straight.  The questions of whether a person is gay, lesbian, bi-sexual, pansexual, trans-gender, or even a cross dresser often get lumped together.  However, they are not the same issues, and should not be treated as if they were.  Most gay people are neither trans-gender nor cross dressers; and people who are cross dressers or trans-gender are not necessarily gay.  In fact, most cross dressers are not gay. 

I would also like to point out words can often do as much damage as physical violence can.  Verbal assaults and insults can leave scars that last for years if they go away at all.  Scars of the psyche or the soul can be more damaging than physical ones.  Using the questioning of a person's gender or their sexuality against them for any reason is simply never acceptable period, and should not be tolerated in our society. 

The anonymity of the Internet has certainly made it easier for individuals and groups to spew their hate by feeling safe hiding behind 'fake' or 'anonymous' e-mail accounts and screen names. These sorts of people are too cowardly to spew their hateful vitriol against people in person to their face; therefore they hurl their insults 'anonymously' and refuse to accept any criticism of their opinions without going into attack mode, screaming censorship, or disappearing and/or changing their online 'identity'.

My first example took place on July 31, 2010 in a minor league baseball stadium.  Brent Bowers, manager of the Golden League Edmonton Capitals, stormed the field to argue with the umpires over a close call during the first inning of a game between his team and the Orange County Flyers.  The crew chief that day was thirty-four year old Billy Van Raaphorst, a California resident who also happens to be gay.  Van Raaphorst had ejected Bowers from a game the previous day; and had warned Bowers and some of his players regarding their heated objections in the current game.  It is at this point Bowers tirade against Van Raaphorst began.  Bowers referred to Van Raaphorst several times as 'a faggot' and a 'fucking faggot' among other things; and demonstrated by bending over and grabbing his ankles how he thought the Umpire 'took it in the ass'.  After Van Raaphorst said nothing stronger than 'Very Classy Brent', and then calmly walked away, Bowers continued to hurl insults at him until the plate Umpire ejected him from the game and escorted him off the field.  The game continued without further incident.
Brent Bowers was initially fined $500 and suspended for two games over his tirade.  However, Umpires across the Golden Baseball League threw their support behind Van Raaphorst and protested, threatening a work stoppage and refusing to officiate games over what they saw as a slap on the wrist.  The league toughened its penalty to a $5000 fine and suspension for the rest of the season, and Bowers ultimately resigned.

This incident, while certainly not reflecting well on Brent Bowers, is an example that sports is one of the holdouts in acceptance of gays within their ranks.  While some athletes such as Steve Nash of the NBA's Phoenix Suns, and recently retired MLB baseball player Ken Griffey Jr. have said they would have no problem playing against or being teammates with openly gay players; athletes willing to make such public statements of support are still few and far between.  It is sad that in the year 2010 anyone would find an outburst such as Brent Bowers tirade against Billy Van Raaphorst in any way acceptable; but some people didn't have that much of a problem with it.  Some people have stated if Bowers had hurled a racial slur at Van Raaphorst his punishment would have been initially harsher, as would have been the reaction to it within the sporting press.  Even the author of one of the articles I used as a reference for this Blog indicated he initially was uncomfortable with comparisons between the struggle for equality of gays and lesbians and the struggle for equality of racial minorities.

My other examples both involve the same person; figure skater Johnny Weir.  As a longtime fan of Mr. Weir, it is frustrating for me to constantly see that the first thing he is often asked is about his sexuality.  Weir is not publicly 'out' in the sense he is not particularly open in discussing as he puts it 'who I sleep with' (As of January 11, 2011 with the release of his memoir 'Welcome to My WorldWeir is indeed officially 'out'.); however at the same time he has never denied anything either.  It is sad that this intelligent, good-looking, articulate, loving, caring and talented young man has so many (thankfully not all) articles and interviews about him focus first and foremost on his sexuality.  It is unfortunate these writers and interviewers are missing so many other interesting aspects of this outstanding young man's life and personality; such as the fact he taught himself the Russian language, he also speaks French, or that he helps support his family and helped put his younger brother through school, when they focus so much on his sexuality.  Unfortunately this is unlikely to change any time soon.

I could go on forever regarding how I personally, from a fan's perspective, feel Weir has been treated by the figure skating establishment over the years, but that's not my objective here.  My objective is to get across how much hate and how many slurs he has had to deal with over the years.

When he returned from the 2006 Winter Olympics in Torino, Italy, Weir was deluged with hate mail and e-mail using lovely descriptive words such as pussy, disgrace, faggot, princess, queeny, retarded, stupid, queer and as he put it 'many other lovely things, so try to be more original at least'.  One letter even suggested Weir should be 'raped to death'.  That people found it appropriate or acceptable to send anyone this sort of garbage, let alone a twenty-one year old young man whose worst crime was being a free spirit and not winning an Olympic medal, is beyond my comprehension.  And for some people, it only went downhill from there. 

Whatever else a person may think of Weir, or think they know about him, he does not deserve the venom that has been thrown at him from some quarters.  No one does.  It is beyond my comprehension that anyone finds it in any way acceptable.  One of the reasons I brought Matthew Shepard into this Blog when it was really meant to be about Billy Van Raaphorst and Johnny Weir is because that young man's horrifying death is a tragic example of what can happen when hate is carried to an extreme. 

A few months ago I was discussing some Johnny Weir videos on YouTube with some other users.  Most of the comments were positive, or at least related to Johnny's skating as opposed to his sexuality.  However, at some point a user made the comment Weir should be killed because he is gay.  Naturally the comment was not well received and was flagged and reported by a number of people, myself included.  Somehow Matthew Shepard's name was brought up, and I stated I cried every time 'I thought about that poor young man'.  Some poor excuse for a human being then posted these exact words 'Shepard got what he deserved and so will Weir'; and another poor excuse for a human being posted 'Shepard got what he deserved' without mentioning Weir.  All of the offending comments were deleted relatively quickly by the users, whether at YouTube's suggestion or of their own volition I can't say for certain.  However, they were not flippant remarks or idle threats, they were genuinely disgusting remarks. 

Soon after these incidents some of us started to get harassed via messages posted at our YouTube channels.  I was told more than once that both I and Johnny Weir were 'queers' and other wonderful little remarks like 'Stupid faggot, burn in hell!'  By the way geniuses, I'm a woman and I'm not gay, but even if I were, so the hell what?!  A few of my friends asked me why did I not get rid of the messages and block the assholes.  I stated I had reported and blocked them, but was leaving the messages up as an reminder of how stupid people really can be.  And like I always say, if you don't like something, don't watch it, don't listen to it, don't read it!  Why devote so much time, energy and effort to commenting on or attacking something you profess to not like or respect?  Leave the rest of us alone and let us try to enjoy it!

Johnny Weir has a reality show called 'Be Good Johnny Weir' on the Sundance Channel (soon to move to LOGO-TV).  The first episode of the show was actually a documentary movie titled 'Pop Star On Ice' which initially premiered in New York City and was subsequently shown at several film festivals across the United States.  There is one scene where Johnny and his friend Paris Childers are watching some commentary about Weir from skating analyst (and founder of 'International Figure Skating') Mark Lund, and Childers remarks he can't believe the comments are being made about a guy in his early twenties (Weir was either twenty-one or twenty-two at the time.) by the commentator.  He then asks Johnny "How old is this guy anyway?"  The commentary was aimed at Weir personally, and not his skating; something that is a constant source of frustration for both he and his fans. 

I wanted to give some context of what Johnny Weir has had to endure over the years to those who may not know him as well as I and some of his fans do; however I can't possibly cover it all here.  Therefore I am going to skip ahead to the Vancouver Winter Olympics in February, 2010.  Johnny Weir finished sixth at the Olympics, and a lot of people do not think he deserved that placing.  Many of us, and not just Johnny's fans, believe he should have finished higher; however, again, that's not what this Blog is about.  A few days after the men's figure skating had concluded, broadcasters Claude Mailhot and Alain Goldberg of RDS, a French-language sports channel in Quebec, mused on air if Weir was unfavorably judged during one of his 'typically flamboyant routines because he wore a semi-see-through pink and black outfit'.
~~

"This may not be politically correct, but do you think he lost points due to his costume and his body language?" Mailhot said.

Goldberg responded that Weir's mannerisms might hurt other men competing in the sport. "They'll think all the boys who skate will end up like him," he said. "It sets a bad example."

The pair joked that Weir should take a gender test like female South African runner Caster Semenya was forced to undergo after stirring up speculation that she was really a man. Mailhot suggested Weir should compete against women.

~~

There is video of this conversation during Episode 109, which is the 2010 Season Finale of  'Be Good Johnny Weir'.  The above remarks ignited a storm of controversy, and though Johnny initially found out about them when Dorothy Hamill came to interview him for 'Access Hollywood' while he was shooting photographs for 'Vanity Fair' magazine; the remarks soon were all over the place.  Dorothy can also be seen in Episode 109 of 'Be Good Johnny Weir'; and in the show and the actual interview shown on 'Access Hollywood' she is visibly upset and close to tears.  Weir had already addressed some mocking comments made by Australian broadcasters Eddie McGuire and Mick Molloy regarding his sexuality in an interview with an Australian television station when he first found out about the remarks made by Mailhot and Goldberg.


Weir's initial reaction is summed up in his remarks to Hamill.  "Every little boy should be so lucky as to turn into me," Weir told her.  "And that's all I have to say about that."  And that was all he had to say about it for a while; however he continued to be asked about it, and finally, several days later, and more than six days after the men's figure skating competition had concluded, Weir conducted a press conference to address the comments made about him. 

More than one hundred journalists from around the world attended Johnny Weir's press conference.  He sat on the stage with only his agent Tara Modlin by his side and addressed the comments and took questions from the journalists without the aid of notes or any other assistance.  With pride and dignity he calmly responded and dealt with slurs and comments no one should have to deal with. 

A few weeks later while introducing Weir at an Equality California fundraiser, EqCa Executive Director Geoffrey Kors stated that Weir's response to the Quebec broadcasters comments had been 'magical'.  Again, footage from the EqCa event, the press conference, and of the Quebec broadcasters may be seen in Episode 109 of 'Be Good Johnny Weir'.  There is also a shortened version of the press conference, and two sources for watching the entire press conference available.  Both sources may be found in my Blog 'Johnny Weir, A Man Amongst Men'.  The video of the EqCa appearance is found on the same Blog, as is an interview with Weir conducted on the red carpet of the recent GLAAD Manhattan event. 

The entire press conference was twenty-seven minutes long and because of its length I will not address everything said here; however I do highly recommend following the link to my Blog and watching the entire press conference, or at least the two and a half minute long shortened version.  While some people would have been visible angry, and certainly Weir must have been upset; he didn't ask for the broadcasters to be fired, or for any action to be taken against them.  He simply hoped for them to have learned something from what they said and the reaction to it.  I can not imagine anyone reacting as well, and with such class and dignity, as Johnny Weir did to these comments.  Despite the fact he doesn't know these men personally, what they said about him had to have hurt.  How could it not?

One of the best things that came out of the whole ugly mess in Vancouver was this beautiful quote from Johnny Weir (said at the press conference):

'Out of ugly, I think the most important thing to do in life is to make something beautiful."
--Johnny Weir



Though I could go on endlessly (haven't I already?) regarding what Johnny Weir has had to deal with over the years, and even what he's had to deal with since Vancouver; I only have one more thing to mention. 

Johnny Weir and Olympic Gold Medalist Evan Lysacek have traded a few barbs over the years, especially the last three years or so.  They are close in age, and basically came up through the ranks of both junior and senior levels of figure skating at the same time.  Johnny Weir has leveled a few digs at Lysacek, and Lysacek has leveled a few digs at Weir.  Neither of them has done it in a vacuum, and with a few exceptions one has often been responding to something the other said. 

However, having said that, a few days ago on August 7, 2010 Evan Lysacek crossed the line.  He said four little words that will forever taint anything he could possibly say afterward for a lot of fans.  In response to a stupid question from a fan on Twitter, who was at the time going by @TahitianFantasy (Angela Springfield), but who later changed her name to @BahamaEscape (Angela Springfield), and now to @MidnightInFiji (A Springfield/Tabitha Starfire), asked Lysacek this question:

'Hey Evan, is Johnny Weir really a guy? hard to tell from the photos I've seen LOL ;)'

To which Evan Lysacek replied: 'verdict is still out'.

At first glance it doesn't seem like much.  However, look again, and think again.  The question from @TahitianFantasy is clearly asking Evan Lysacek whether Weir is really a 'guy'; and on top of that it is done in a joking manner.  This Tweet sat on Lysacek's feed for five hours, until he came along and decided to answer it.  Of all the questions he could have picked out to answer, he picked out this one.  Lysacek knows about the hurtful comments made about Weir's gender in Vancouver; not to mention the additional comments made about his sexuality, and he could easily have avoided answering this question altogether, however he chose not to ignore it and deliberately picked it out to respond to.  Because of the comments in Vancouver, and the history between Weir and Lysacek, this can not possibly be written off as a flippant or joking remark.  Questioning Weir's gender was not funny for Mailhot and Goldberg, and it is NOT funny for Evan Lysacek either. 

For around twelve hours fans of both Lysacek (who currently has 60,762 Twitter followers) and Weir (who currently has 77,661 Twitter followers) sent Lysacek questions about his Tweet and asked for explanations and hopefully an apology.  Finally they received an answer, but it wasn't the one we expected.  Lysacek first tried to claim the Tweet was sent from a 'fake account'; a Twitter member who has/had an account EvanIysacek (using a capital I instead of a L).  The EvanIysacek account is a parody, and since the owner quickly responded and distanced himself from the remark this explanation did not wash for Lysacek. At this point he began to claim he was hacked.  This also did not go over well with a lot of fans, and it was actually pretty stupid when all the facts are looked at.  Evan sent the Tweets claiming he was hacked from his 'official' Twitter page, and this was all while the offending Tweet was sitting ON his 'official' Twitter page right underneath his explanations.  'Twittergate' as some fans have come to call it has been documented brilliantly in the Blog Olympic Gold Medalist Shows His True Colors with screen caps and time lines.  If you read this Blog, and I hope you do; you will probably understand why this was such a big deal and you will also see a mountain of evidence that makes it next to impossible to believe Lysacek's Tweet came from any place other than his 'official' account, or that he was hacked.

Some fans are completely convinced Evan Lysacek was genuinely hacked, and others do not see why this was all such a big deal.  It was a big deal because Evan Lysacek answered a stupid, insulting question with a stupid insulting remark knowing what Weir has had to deal with in the past; and then tried to blame it on someone else.  When blaming it on someone else did not work, he then tried to claim he was hacked. What's even worse is that the person who sent the question in the first place did not understand why it was such a big deal.  At first she ignored it, and when people started calling 'her' on it and not just Lysacek she tried to push it off by saying she didn't like Weir.  She thought it was okay to ask an insulting question about him because she 'doesn't support him'.  In addition she has no idea what the difference between gay, gender, sex, trans-gender and so forth is.  She even went as far as to tell me she 'didn't know Weir was gay' when she asked the question.  And that makes it all okay?  Is Angela/Tabitha seriously telling me she was questioning the gender of a man who she thought was straight?  As if it was okay to question Weir's gender regardless of whether he is gay or straight?

Two days after the Tweet Lysacek sent an 'apology' out via TwitLonger.  However, even his apology was lame.  Nowhere in his apology did he say 'I apologize...' or 'My apologies...', and he also did not apologize to his own fans, many of whom were deeply hurt by the whole mess.  And Evan, you're right, you can NOT apologize enough! 


What was Johnny Weir saying while all this was going on?  Nothing.  Once again he responded with class and dignity and said nothing.  He went on about his daily life; working, training, interviewing, writing, and made no comment whatsoever because he does have class and dignity.  And good for him!  His wonderful parents Patti and John Weir raised both their children properly, and trust me, it shows!  As my friend 'Binky' said:

‘So he can look at your appalling little tweet, crinkle his nose at its foul aroma, and then step gracefully aside and sail right on past it up there on the high road, choosing not to dignify it with even the slightest bit of his attention.

And if somebody has the bad manners to ask him about it, he can simply smile, shake his head slightly, and respond, with grace and class (look ‘em up…) and a look of genuine pity on his beautiful face…’

Other sources for 'Twittergate' info:

Misfit Mimes Blog: I Don't Evan

Misfit Mimes Blog: Oh I See He Decided to Go With Multi-Part Option D

One last thing; I promised my readers at Fanfiction.net an explanation for why I made a point of mentioning the 'hockey players' in Chapter Twenty-Three of my story 'A Force of Nature: Part II'.  Episode 109 of 'Be Good Johnny Weir' covers the time between the U.S. Nationals Figure Skating Championships in January 2010 and the Vancouver Olympics in February 2010.  It also covers some of the happenings in the first few weeks after the Olympics.  Anyway, near the beginning of the episode Johnny is training at his rink and he is getting ready to leave.  He tells us he has to 'go brave the hockey players'.  He then tells us that 'last week they called me Johnny Queer', and goes on to say they made blow-job gestures at him.  You see him nervously walking out of the rink carrying his skate bag and you can't help wondering if he's worried about another encounter with the dumb jock hockey players.  Until we saw that scene, a lot of Johnny's fans hadn't made as much of a personal connection with what he has had to deal with on a daily basis for a number of years now; the slurs, the comments, the gestures, etc.  One of my friends said, "I never thought about him having to deal with it in his personal life."

He does have to deal with it in his personal life, and it's sad.  It's sad for him, it's sad for Billy Van Raaphorst, and it's sad for the millions of other people out there like them.  A lot of people out there should be ashamed of themselves, because all these people deserve better.

~~~~~~~~

For More Information Please Check Out the Following Websites: 

The Advocate Online

GLAAD.org

GLAAD on Twitter

Equality California

Outsports.com

Flameout.org Home Page

Out Magazine

Matthew Shepard:

Matthew Shepard Foundation

Remembering Matthew Shepard on the 12-Year Observance of his Death

A Matthew Shepard Memorial Page

Flameout.org Matthew Shepard Page

Johnny Weir:

Gender Test THIS (Olympic Champion Shows His True Colors)

MisfitMimes Blog: I Don't Evan

Misfit Mimes Blog: Oh I See He Decided to Go With Multi-Part Option D

Misfit Mimes Blog: Guuuuuurrrrrrlll!

Johnny Weir: A Man Amongst Men  (My Blog with video of Vancouver Press Conference)

Outsports.com - Evan Lysacek Questions Johnny Weir's Gender

Evan Lysacek Twitter Incident Another Example of Homophobia in Sports (Also addresses the Billy Van Raaphorst/Brent Bowers incident)

Johnny Weir's March 2006 Blog  (Describes Some of the Slurs He Has Endured)

Sundance Channel's Johnny Weir Page

French Broadcasters: Johnny Weir Should Take Gender Test

Quebec Gay and Lesbian Council Calls on Broadcasters to Apologize

Complaints Filed Against Homophobic Sportscasters

Billy Van Raaphorst:

Manager Out After Anti-Gay Rant Against Umpire

Ump's Ordeal Shows Sad State of Sports

Minor League Manager's Outburst Toward Gay Ump Was All About Hate

Read More About Manager Bowers

Caps Manager Accused of Anti-Gay Rant

Friday, September 24, 2010

My Response to Scott Blackmun's General Address to the USOC

September 25, 2010 Update:

Amongst his other remarks NBC Sports and Olympics chairman Dick Ebersol echoed Blackmun's praise for Lysacek in his speech to the U.S. Olympic Assembly awards dinner Friday night.

"Evan Lysacek, on very little sleep, appeared before the world press repeatedly in the hours following his victory,'' Ebersol said. "He so artfully walked through that whole minefield and made us proud to be Americans."

"He never took the bait. He just talked about how wonderful it was to be an Olympian. It was spectacular.''
----
To be honest, there is not a lot I can say in response to this.  It is true that Evan, without much sleep, repeatedly appeared before the world press and he did NOT respond in kind when he so easily could have.  He did take a few hits from the Russian press, and even Putin became involved.

I am, however, struggling a little with the use of the word 'spectacular' when so much else happened in these Olympics, not all of it pleasant, and some of it genuinely spectacular!   However, figure skating is a marquee event at the Winter Olympics, so there was a lot of press attention and there is no doubt Evan handled things well at the time.  I think what most of  are struggling with here is his behavior since, which has been less than exemplary at times. 

Johnny Weir will never get the recognition from NBC, the USOC, the USFSA or so many other entities that he deserves.  Sad really!
++++
On September 23rd, 2010 USOC CEO Scott Blackmun and USOC Chairman of the Board Larry Probst delivered a general address to the U.S. Olympic Assembly

Here is my response to the remarks by Scott Blackmun, the CEO of the U.S.O.C. (also posted at the Olympic team Facebook page):

Blackmun made some good comments, however his mention of Evan Lysacek being his proudest moment of the Vancouver games turned me off.

It's too bad Lysacek hasn't kept up behavior worthy of a 'proudest' moment. His snide remarks re Johnny Weir's gender via Twitter (Olympic Gold Medalist Shows His True Colors); his comments suggesting Weir was not good enough for Stars On Ice, as well as a few other remarks he has made are an embarrassment not worthy of an Olympic Gold Medalist. 

'Great character'?  Really Mr. Probst?  'Great character' is not solely defined by a one-time reaction to a stupid remark; it is defined by how a person handles a lifetime of remarks, situations, slurs, disappointments and so on.  Johnny Weir is such a person; and while I wouldn't say Evan Lysacek has 'bad' character, I don't think he can be defined as having 'great character' either. 

While I would agree Lysacek handled the comments from Plushenko and the others very well at the time; I was far more impressed with how Weir handled the comments from the Canadian and Australian broadcasters re his gender.  There's a 'proudest moment' and a 'teaching moment'!
 
++++
Following are the complete remarks of Scott Blackmun and Larry Probst before the U.S. Olympic Assembly:
 
Scott Blackmun and Larry Probst deliver general address to U.S. Olympic Assembly

September 24, 2010 9:23 AM vanessa.virbitsky@usoc.org

U.S. Olympic Assembly: General Address (Larry Probst)

I think it’s safe to say, this past year has been one of the most challenging in the history of the USOC.

And in many ways, it has also been one of the best.

Team USA—our incredible athletes—did something in Vancouver that no American team had achieved at the Winter Games since 1932.

They won more medals than any other nation… thirty-seven in total … a Winter Olympic Games record.

Some may have thought we would never see Americans on the top of the podium in Nordic Combined - but Bill Demong and Johnny Spillane did precisely that.

And my hat is off to our Paralympic Team as well – they did a phenomenal job of representing our country!

What incredible inspiration Team USA delivered to America from Vancouver!

And it has been a very significant year off the field of play as well.

Without rehashing all the issues we faced in the last year, I do believe the USOC is in a much better place today than this time a year ago.

We have strengthened the responsiveness and openness of our organization from top to bottom.

We have become more engaged in your needs here at home—and in the needs of the International Olympic community.

We’ve taken measures that not only improved our governance model and strengthened our leadership team, but have begun to build a new foundation of trust with Lausanne and the leaders of international sport.

We are much more of a family—with more equality and more opportunity to be heard at the leadership level.

In short, we are making progress on multiple fronts and I firmly believe the USOC is now on a very positive track.

In many ways, last year was a year of earning trust.

Trust doesn’t happen because of titles or past accomplishments.

Trust doesn’t come from promises.

Trust belongs to the province of relationships.

You build trust by earning respect … and developing friendships… both at home and abroad.

And I think the journey we’ve begun is headed in the direction of real trust and genuine respect.

Our theme at this Assembly is “One Team.”

To be one team, we have to trust one another.

And so, as I talk about what we attempted to do and what we accomplished in this last year, I want you to know that most of the initiatives I led as chairman were the direct and specific result of listening to you.

In my mind, the ability to listen and learn is one of the most important requirements for any successful executive.

Out of the turmoil that followed Chicago’s devastating loss last October, I decided to put those skills to the test—to listen and learn in an effort to get to know you better, and to better understand The Movement, before moving forward with any important initiatives.

To give you a sense of what motivates me, let me tell you why I came to the USOC in the first place.

I believe that sport provides, perhaps more than anything else in life, a platform that unites us.

That may seem ironic given some of the historic divisions in our organization, but I believe it is true.

And it’s certainly true across America when Team USA is competing.

I believe the American dream and the Olympic dream are almost perfectly aligned.

And I believe that we—the U.S. Olympic Family—have one of the most important responsibilities in our country - helping young athletes to develop their talents—and providing the road map that can ultimately lead them to the podium.

Because we help make it possible for American athletes to experience the glory of representing their country and achieving everything they’re capable of achieving, I believe we play a unique and privileged role in American society.

I joined the USOC to help strengthen and support that effort—to unite us and our world in friendship and peace through sport.

Then came Chicago 2016 … and the idea that America was once again ready … this time with the right candidate city … to welcome the world back to our shores for the Summer Olympic Games.

Let me recount what happened … not to stir resentment … or bemoan the loss – Rio won fair and square - but to provide perspective on where we really stood in the Olympic world … as opposed to where we thought we stood.

Chicago 2016 offered the IOC everything an American city could possibly deliver.

A great plan set along the shores of Lake Michigan that would deliver an extraordinary experience for the athletes.

A great bid leader in Pat Ryan - one of the most capable and accomplished men ever to step into the five ring arena.

A great mayor in Richard M Daley. The magnificent transformation of Chicago under his leadership demonstrates that he is a true visionary.

A passionately committed President and First Lady – and a White House ready to make Olympic, Paralympic and Youth Sport a national priority.

A nation rising in support … with more than 170 cities celebrating Olympic Day in honor of Chicago 2016 … and a legacy plan designed to draw inner city youth to sport in new ways for years to come.

It was a bid of incredible technical merit and social promise.

And yet, we lost tragically in round one.

Without taking anything away from Rio’s win – the first ever Games to take place on the continent of South America - the rejection of Chicago was a shocking blow … that told us there was still much work to be done.

And that loss convinced me that I had a lot to learn about the Olympic Movement … and how it worked internationally if I was going to serve you as an effective leader overseas.

More importantly—and even more immediately—the reaction to the loss here at home—your reaction as the U.S. Olympic Family—opened my eyes to the fact we had very serious problems within our own family

… that trust was completely lost … and that nothing short of a full transformation in our relationships and our governance was needed … if we were going to have any chance to continue to fulfill our mission and begin to operate as one team.

The situation called for a year of real action, which I would describe as significant and sustainable change.

From my perspective, it called for three things: reassessment, reengagement and redirection.

Reassessment meant looking at our governance, our decision making process and the way in which we related to and served each and every one of the constituent groups gathered here this week. It meant the Tagliabue Commission.

Reengagement meant a new beginning in the long-term process of building meaningful relationships, friendships and partnerships with the IOC and the broader Olympic Movement. It meant a new focus on international relations.

Redirection meant finding the right leader to engage with our entire family – someone who would listen, learn and develop a strategic plan that ensured we were moving in the right direction on every front. It meant a search for a new CEO.

Let me comment on each:

First, the Tagliabue Commission. Toward the end of last year, I asked former NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue to chair an independent advisory committee with the core mission of assessing our governance and recommending structural changes and enhancements that would make us more responsive to each and every constituent group we serve.

I asked Paul with the full expectation that this committee would do more than help us restructure. I believed that under his expert guidance, they would help identify a path by which we could begin rebuilding the trust that had been lost within our family—between the Board, the staff, the NGBs, the AAC and the MSOs.

I knew this was going to be a very critical undertaking—and that it could not possibly achieve the right insights and results without the full participation of established NGB leaders and athletes—both Olympians and Paralympians—plus a number of key, critical thinkers within our ranks.

With Jeanne Picariello, John Naber, Courtney Johnson, Ann Cody, Matt Van Houten and Skip Gilbert on board, to name a few, I was confident we’d gain great insights from their work.

And they did not disappoint.

With the recommendation to expand the board, it will be more representative and democratic with a broader range of voices that more accurately reflect the needs and aspirations of all stakeholders—with more channels to ensure that your collective interests are expressed, heard and acted upon.

I want to thank Paul Tagliabue and all the members of his commission again for the stellar work they did on behalf of the USOC.

Please give them all a hand.

The second major initiative I undertook in the last year is long-term in the extreme.

And it is much, much more engaging for me personally.

International relations in the Olympic Movement is about personal involvement.

Sport will always be a relationship business, but in the Olympic Movement it is based on a set of shared ideals … that make it much more of a culture than a business.

In many ways, it is a society of sport that revolves around relationships and networks of friends who help shape the direction of the Olympic Movement.

The single most important requirement for success in this game is being there.

You have to be present, not represented by someone else, but personally present.

And I can assure you, I have been present this past year – in Vancouver, in Merida/Mexico, in Lausanne, in Dubai, in Mayaguez/Puerto Rico, in Singapore and with trips planned later this year to Mexico, Japan, China and Serbia to name a few.

I’m gaining insights and perspectives on how key IOC members view America’s place in the Olympic Movement and the appropriate role of the NOCs.

I think we’re in a better position, relationship-wise, than we’ve been in some time. A concrete example is the recently announced agreement that we negotiated with the IOC to address the issue of Games costs. We created a win-win scenario for both the USOC and the IOC and solved a troublesome problem that had been lingering for years.

But I don’t want to exaggerate our achievements.

This is a space that is very hard to evaluate in terms of progress.

It’s obviously up to others to pass judgment on the quality of the relationships we’re building.

But, I will say this. We are taking a thoughtful, patient and systematic approach to this activity and I believe we are succeeding.

American business is primarily focused on results – there is typically a rush to the bottom line.

But in the world of international relations, at least in the Olympic Movement, the concern is more about process than results, more about means rather than the end, and more about dialogue than conclusions.

We are being honest and open and present and I believe we are on the right track.

Now to redirection. Perhaps our biggest single accomplishment this year was hiring Scott Blackmun and bringing him back to the USOC.

Let’s give Scott a true USA welcome to his first Olympic Assembly as our CEO.

You know, I spent a lot of time during my career evaluating executive talent. At Electronic Arts there was a constant search for executives with the ability to foster a winning environment and to create the conditions that facilitated outstanding performance. In looking for the right leader, you always begin by aligning the credentials and experience with the requirements of the responsibility.

Then it becomes a matter of judging character, and confirming alignment on a common vision. You listen carefully to candidates to get a sense about the kind of environment they would create as a leader, the impact they would have on the team, and their motivation to excel.

In Scott’s case - the fit was perfect. It’s the job he has always wanted and it’s the job I believe he was destined to have.

Everything that has happened since we brought Scott back has confirmed that we found the leader we needed. I won’t steal his thunder by telling you about the strategic plan he’s developed, but the Board is united in its opinion that he is leading us … not only in the right direction … but in the best direction.

And I personally could not be more pleased to be partnered with such a skilled and humble consensus builder. Over the next decade, I believe he will make our team much stronger, our brand even more respected and our role in the Olympic Movement ever more prominent.

Now let me close by telling you what the Olympic Movement means to me.

I believe the Olympic Movement is the greatest force for good in our world today.

Because of what it does in more than 200 countries 365 days a year, filling young people with the inspiration of sport and the values of excellence, friendship and respect, the Olympic Movement is worthy of our full dedication and support.

While politics and deal making may always be part of the equation … the Olympic Movement embodies the highest ideals of sport. It is sport with a social purpose, and that purpose is to build a better world.

To achieve that end, I believe the Olympic Movement needs a strong, vital and healthy partnership with the United States.

And I’m committed to building that partnership internationally … to helping achieve that ultimate goal … working closely with you, and Scott, to strengthen your organizations here at home … and fulfilling our role as a model of excellence in the global Olympic Movement!

Thank you.

Now, before I turn the podium over to Scott, let’s remember why we do what we do.
++++
U.S. Olympic Assembly: General Address (Scott Blackmun)

There’s nothing I can say about the Vancouver Games that would do justice to the remarkable achievements of America’s athletes. 37 medals.

The most ever by an American team.

The most ever by any team.

But these weren’t just winners on the field of play…this was a team with great character.

I think about Evan Lysacek, and the way he handled the critical comments that were made following his amazing performance.

As an American, it was one of my proudest moments during the Games. As a father, it was a great teaching moment.

Most of you know that I was a candidate for this job in 2001.

While it was a difficult pill to swallow at the time, in retrospect I am grateful to be standing here now instead of then.

And I’ll tell you why.

In 2001, the USOC wasn’t structured to succeed. We were an organization driven by compromises.

If you support my cause, I will support yours.

Often times the causes weren’t even USOC causes.

They were individual NGB causes. Or AAC causes. Or community-based organization causes. And on and on and on. I was there and I saw it happening every day.

Thankfully, we made significant changes in 2003.

I don’t need to remind you what they were, but the theory was that we would have a board of directors that, free from any conflicts of interest,….AND I QUOTE “could agree on…and then manage…the appropriate prioritization of purposes and allocation of resources”.

The theory was spot on.

But we threw the baby out with the bathwater.

In addition to eliminating the conflicts of interest, we stopped listening to our constituents.

And that’s why we got into the trouble that we did.

As I stand here today, though, I am filled with optimism about the future of our American Olympic family, and in particular about the future of the USOC.

One of the reasons for that is we have a Chairman who is not only a world class leader, but a leader whose only aspirations are to advance the cause of the United States Olympic Committee.

Larry has told many of you that when he first took the job, he wasn’t aware of how much time it would take to do it well.

He knows now.

What I have seen since I started in January is a Chairman who is focused on building relationships with the people who matter most in the worldwide Olympic Movement.

Larry told you a little bit about where he’s been. Suffice it to say he’s been everywhere we asked him to go.

And believe me, this is a guy who has a lot of other options.

Let me say it a different way.

Larry stepped forward.

He stepped forward to listen.

He didn’t shy away from controversy or criticism. He didn’t take the easy way out.

And he’s been a great partner for me and the rest of our management team.

I want to make sure you know that he has our support and our gratitude. ..Larry, thank you.

The other cause for my optimism derives from the immense power of America’s athletes and their stories.

The power to inspire us and make all of us recognize that we’re part of something more than just sport.

We are surrounded by role models and heroes, and on some level we just need to get out of their way.

People like Jesse Owens, who well before the Civil Rights era, transcended prejudice here and abroad to become America’s proud symbol of excellence and dignity at the Olympic Games in Nazi Germany

Bonnie Blair, who with five Gold medals, continues to show us that humility and grace can accompany greatness.

Dan Jansen, who persevered through tragedy and stunning disappointments to gather himself together in his final Olympic appearance and win a gold medal we all wanted him to win.

Billy Mills, a native American Lakota, who overcame poverty and bigotry to represent our nation in Tokyo, and in a shocking upset, outran one of the finest 10,000 meter fields in history.

I could go on forever.

And it’s not just those of us that live in the Olympic movement that are inspired by America’s Olympians.

Consider these numbers from a survey we released last week:

90 percent of Americans agreed with the statement that U.S. Olympians “most positively represent the U.S. to the world.” 90 percent.

The second place vote-getter was professional baseball players at 30 percent.

Think about that.

86 percent of Americans believe Team USA “exemplifies excellence.” Next closest is the NFL at 36 percent.

84 percent believe our athletes are “positive role models for children.”

Maybe the most important learning from our survey…84 percent

Second place was the NCAA at 37 percent.

So our job is simple.

We, and by “we” I mean the USOC, already have a world class product.

Our job is to create the platform for the stories of our athletes to be told. It’s as easy as that.

But we have to conduct our business in a way that doesn’t denigrate those stories. We denigrate those stories when we allow our political struggles to occupy even the smallest share of mind outside of this room.

As the custodians of the Olympic and Paralympic Movement in the United States, we can’t allow the stories of our athletes to be crowded off the page by stories about us.

We will have disagreements. And we will make mistakes.

The important thing is that we have to address those disagreements directly, and in a spirit of partnership.

And our mission of competitive excellence has to be foremost in our minds when we have those discussions.

Eleanor Roosevelt said…

“Small minds talk about people,…average minds talk about events…, great minds talk about ideas”.

We need to talk about ideas.

The ideas that will serve our cause and move us forward together for decades to come.

On the subject of partnership, the NGBs have a much more difficult job than the USOC.

We look to you, our NGBs, to identify, motivate, support and train the athletes who will represent the United States at the Olympic Games.

And as we all know, there are millions of young men and women, some not yet born, who have a chance to compete on the world’s largest stage.

Even with resources, the task of shaping those young men and women into Olympic caliber athletes is monumental.

But many of you have limited resources, and I recognize that our most important job is to provide you with more.

We do not view ourselves as your competitor in the marketplace for sponsorship dollars. Most of our revenue goes to the NGBs and their athletes, and it does not matter whether it comes in through a USOC door or an NGB door.

One of my highest priorities is to change the culture of the USOC when it comes to the tone of our relationship with the NGBs.

We need to operate in a culture of service to you, not supervision and superiority.

That doesn’t mean we won’t have high expectations of our partners, some of which are in the Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports Act and some of which aren’t.

Partnership is a two way street, and we don’t have the luxury of allocating resources where they don’t have an impact.

But it does mean that we will define our success by your success, and that we’ll do everything we reasonably can to help you get there.

If I may, I would like to digress for a few minutes and walk you through where we as an organization are focused.

Let’s start with where we want to be, with a vision for the future.

Much has been said in the last year about governance, and you all know that the composition of our board of directors will likely be altered tomorrow.

Irrespective of the outcome of those discussions, I promise you, individually and collectively, that you will have a voice.

The Olympians will have a voice.

Multisport organizations will have a voice.

The AAC will have a voice and the NGB Council will have a voice.

I am accessible to all of you and I want to hear what’s on your mind.

The quality of the dialogue, however, must continue to evolve.

Twenty years ago, when I first became exposed to the US Olympic Movement, much of the dialogue was about the balance of power among our constituents.

It was, to use Eleanor Roosevelt’s words, about people, rather than ideas.

Last year we allowed that dialogue to resurface by failing to communicate.

Thankfully, I think we are at a different point today.

These next couple days will hopefully be about what we can do together to support the Olympic and Paralympic movement in America and America’s elite athletes.

That idea, and those athletes, are why we all got involved in the first place.

As a closing thought, let’s have some fun.

Athletes from the United States have won more than 2,000 medals in the modern Olympic Games. 2,573…more than any other country on the planet.

We’re obviously doing a lot of things right.

I think we should spend more of our time together recognizing that fact and celebrating how lucky we are to be a part of the greatest sports movement in the world.

I’m honored to be part of that movement and I’m grateful for your partnership as we lead the movement into the future.

Thank you.

For more information, please contact the USOC Communications Division at (719) 866-4529 or visit The Official Website of the USOC. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

++++


Resources and References:

Wheres My Koppy's Blog: gender test THIS: Olympic Gold Medalist Shows His True Colors

gender test THIS: Olympic gold medalist shows his true colors

Wheres My Koppy's Blog: Unfortunately It's All About Hate and Ignorance...

Misfit Mimes Blog: I Don't Evan

Misfit Mimes Blog: Oh I See He Decided to Go With Multi-Part Option D ...

Misfit Mimes Blog: Guuuuuurrrrrrlll...

Johnny Weir: A Man Amongst Men  (My Blog with video of Vancouver Press Conference) 
Outsports.com - Evan Lysacek Questions Johnny Weir's Gender

Johnny Weir's March 2006 Blog  (Describes Some of the Slurs He Has Endured)

French Broadcasters: Johnny Weir Should Take Gender Test

Quebec Gay and Lesbian Council Calls on Broadcasters to Apologize
Complaints Filed Against Homophobic Sportscasters

EW.com PopWatch: Johnny Weir responds to commentators who questioned his gender, example he sets

UPDATE: USOC, NBC Sports bosses give props to Evan Lysacek

Tuesday, August 17, 2010

Unfortunately It's All About Hate and Ignorance...

May 23, 2011 Update: Nash voices support for gay marriage

Phoenix Suns star Steve Nash, who is quoted in this Blog below for being one of the few professional athletes who have publicly stated they would have no problem playing against or being teammates with openly gay players, has spoken out in favor of gay marriage in a video released today by the Washington, D.C.-based Human Rights Campaign (HRC).

Nash's decision to join the campaign follows in the footsteps of New York Rangers forward Sean Avery, who also appeared in a video for the HRC earlier this month; and it also comes one week after Suns CEO Rick Welts revealed he is gay.

++++

In observance of the twelve year anniversary of Matthew Shepard's murder I have slightly updated and reposted this Blog at this location: Unfortunately It's All About Hate and Ignorance... (Repost).

++++

I touch briefly on a very important (to me at least) issue that I take seriously in Chapter Twenty-Three of my FanFic 'A Force of Nature: Part II'.  This story is one of my eight 'Criminal Minds' related FanFiction stories that focus on the character of Spencer Reid.  The story is posted on my page at FanFiction.net.  The issue is the treatment of gays in sports, and also in life in general. 

We hear about tragic incidents such as the murder of Matthew Shepard; a twenty-one year old gay man who had his whole life in front of him.  Matthew was murdered October 7, 1998 by Aaron McKinney and Russell Henderson for no reason other than he was a gay man.  I do not believe I need to go into the details of this wonderful young man's brutal murder to get the point across his tragic death stands as an example of the homophobic idiocy of a segment of the population.  Matthew's parents Judy and Dennis have attempted to make sense of their son's death by creating a foundation in his name.  Judy has also written ‘The Meaning of Matthew: My Son’s Murder in Laramie, and a World Transformed’; a book about her son's life and death, and the changes she believes have come about since people found it acceptable to show up at her son's funeral with signs containing hateful slogans such as  'God Hates Fags' and 'Fag Matt Burn In Hell'.  The same group also showed up at a hearing for Russell Henderson carrying signs with similar slogans, but was met by peaceful counter demonstrators. 

Despite the morons who claim Matthew deserved to die because he was gay, I remember a number of Wyoming residents coming forward in an attempt to let the world know not everyone who lived in the state where Matthew was murdered were of the same opinion.  Matthew's own parents stated their son would "emphasize he does not want the horrible actions of a few very disturbed individuals to mar the fine reputations of Laramie or the university."  Dennis Shepard reportedly relayed through Wyoming governor Jim Geringer, that he did not want his son's death to become "a media circus" and that "we should not use Matt to further an agenda."  Personally I feel like crying every time I think of this young man's tragic death.

Matthew Shepard is only one example of a gay or lesbian person who was attacked, beaten or murdered simply because they were gay.  It happens far too often in the United States.  Or course it happens other places as well; for example two teenage boys were recently executed in Iran for the 'sin of being gay'.  However, I can speak far more knowledgeably regarding what I observe in my own society and the encounters I have online and in everyday life. 

There are three recent incidents that have prompted me to finally write this Blog.  Neither of these incidents resulted in any physical violence; they involved verbal insults, homophobic slurs and the questioning of an athlete's gender.  I would like to state at this point in time questioning a person's gender is not the same as questioning whether a person is gay or straight.  The questions of whether a person is gay, lesbian, bi-sexual, trans-gender, or even a cross dresser often get lumped together.  However, they are not the same issues, and should not be treated as if they were.  Most gay people are neither trans-gender nor cross dressers; and people who are cross dressers or trans-gender are not necessarily gay.  In fact, most cross dressers are not gay. 

I would also like to point out words can often do as much damage as physical violence can.  Verbal assaults and insults can leave scars that last for years if they go away at all.  Scars of the psyche or the soul can be more damaging than physical ones.  Using the questioning of a person's gender or sexuality against them for any reason is simply never acceptable period, and should not be tolerated in our society. 

The anonymity of the Internet has certainly made it easier for individuals and groups to spew their hate by feeling safe hiding behind 'fake' or 'anonymous' e-mail accounts and screen names. These sorts of people are too cowardly to spew their hateful vitriol to people in person to their face; therefore they hurl their insults 'anonymously' and refuse to accept any criticism of their opinions without going into attack mode, or disappearing and/or changing their online 'identity'.

My first example took place on July 31, 2010 in a minor league baseball stadium.  Brent Bowers, manager of the Golden League Edmonton Capitals, stormed the field to argue with the umpires over a close call during the first inning of a game between his team and the Orange County Flyers.  The crew chief that day was thirty-four year old Billy Van Raaphorst, a California resident who also happens to be gay.  Van Raaphorst had ejected Bowers from a game the previous day; and had warned Bowers and some of his players regarding their heated objections in the current game.  It is at this point Bowers tirade against Van Raaphorst began.  Bowers referred to Van Raaphorst several times as 'a faggot' and a 'fucking faggot' among other things; and demonstrated by bending over and grabbing his ankles how he thought the Umpire 'took it in the ass'.  After Van Raaphorst calmly walked away Bowers continued to hurl insults at him until the plate Umpire ejected him from the game and escorted him off the field.  The game continued without further incident.

Brent Bowers was initially fined $500 and suspended for two games over his tirade.  However, Umpires across the Golden Baseball League threw their support behind Van Raaphorst and protested, threatening a work stoppage and refusing to officiate games over what they saw as a slap on the wrist.  The league toughened its penalty to a $5000 fine and suspension for the rest of the season, and Bowers ultimately resigned.

This incident, while certainly not reflecting well on Brent Bowers, is an example that sports is one of the holdouts in acceptance of gays within their ranks.  While some athletes such as Steve Nash of the NBA's Phoenix Suns, and recently retired MLB baseball player Ken Griffey Jr. have said they would have no problem playing against or being teammates with openly gay players; athletes willing to make such public statements of support are still few and far between.  It's sad that in the year 2010 anyone would find an outburst such as Brent Bowers tirade against Billy Van Raaphorst in any way acceptable; but some people didn't have that much of a problem with it.  Some people have stated if Bowers had hurled a racial slur at Van Raaphorst his punishment would have been initially harsher, as would have been the reaction to it within the sporting press.  Even the author of one of the articles I used as a reference indicated he initially was uncomfortable with comparisons between the struggle for equality of gays and lesbians and the struggle for equality of racial minorities.

My other examples both involve the same person; figure skater Johnny Weir.  As a longtime fan of Mr. Weir, it is frustrating for me to constantly see that the first thing he is often asked is about his sexuality.  Weir is not publicly 'out' in the sense he is not particularly open in discussing as he puts it 'who I sleep with'; however at the same time he has never denied anything either.  It's sad that this intelligent, good-looking, articulate, loving, caring and talented young man has so many articles and interviews about him focus first and foremost on his sexuality.  It's unfortunate these writers and interviewers are missing so many other interesting aspects of this outstanding young man's life and personality; such as the fact he taught himself the Russian language, he also speaks French, or that he helps support his family and helped put his younger brother through school, when they focus so much on his sexuality.  Unfortunately this is unlikely to change any time soon.

I could go on forever regarding how I personally, from a fan's perspective, feel Weir has been treated by figure skating establishment over the years, but that's not my objective here.  My objective is to get across how much hate and how many slurs he has had to deal with over the years.

When he returned from the 2006 Winter Olympics in Torino, Italy, Weir was deluged with hate mail and e-mail using lovely descriptive words such as pussy, disgrace, faggot, princess, queeny, retarded, stupid, queer and as he put it 'many other lovely things, so try to be more original at least'.  That people found it appropriate to send anyone this sort of garbage, let alone a twenty-one year old young man whose worst crime was being a free spirit and not winning an Olympic medal, is beyond my comprehension.  And for some people, it only went downhill from there. 

Whatever else a person may think of Weir, or think they know about him, he does not deserve the venom that has been thrown at him from some quarters.  No one does.  It is beyond my comprehension that anyone finds it in any way acceptable.  One of the reasons I brought Matthew Shepard into this Blog when it was really meant to be about Billy Van Raaphorst and Johnny Weir is because that young man's horrifying death is a tragic example of what can happen when hate is carried to an extreme. 

A few months ago I was discussing some Johnny Weir videos on YouTube with some other users.  Most of the comments were positive, or at least related to Johnny's skating as opposed to his sexuality.  However, at some point a user made the comment Weir should be killed because he is gay.  Naturally the comment was not well received and was flagged and reported by a number of people, myself included.  Somehow Matthew Shepard's name was brought up, and I stated I cried every time 'I thought about that poor young man'.  Some poor excuse for a human being then posted these exact words 'Shepard got what he deserved and so will Weir'; and another poor excuse for a human being posted 'Shepard got what he deserved' without mentioning Weir.  All of the offending comments were deleted relatively quickly by the users, whether at YouTube's suggestion or of their own volition I can't say.  However, they were not flippant remarks or idle threats, they were genuinely disgusting remarks. 

Soon after these incidents some of us started to get harassed via messages posted at our YouTube channels.  I was told more than once that both I and Johnny Weir were 'queers' and other wonderful little remarks like 'Stupid faggot, burn in hell!'  By the way geniuses, I'm a woman and I'm not gay, but even if I were, so the hell what?!  A few of my friends asked me why did I not get rid of the messages and block the assholes.  I stated I had reported and blocked them, but was leaving the messages up as an reminder of how stupid people really can be.  And like I always say, If you don't like something, don't watch it!  Why devote so much time and effort to commenting on or attacking something you profess to not like or respect?  Leave the rest of us alone and let us try to enjoy it!
 
Johnny Weir has a reality show called 'Be Good Johnny Weir' on the Sundance Channel.  The first episode of the show was actually a documentary movie titled 'Pop Star On Ice' which initially premiered in New York and was subsequently shown at several film festivals across the United States.  There is one scene where Johnny and his friend
Paris Childers are watching some commentary about Weir by a skating analyst and Childers remarks he can't believe the comments are being made about a guy in his early twenties (Weir was either twenty-one or twenty-two at the time.) by the commentator.  He then asks Johnny "How old is this guy anyway?"

I wanted to give some context of what Johnny Weir has had to endure over the years to those who may not know him as well as I and some of his fans do; however I can't possibly cover it all here.  Therefore I am going to skip ahead to the Vancouver Winter Olympics in February, 2010.  Johnny Weir finished sixth at the Olympics, and a lot of people do not think he deserved that placing.  Many of us, and not just Johnny's fans, believe he should have finished higher; however, again, that's not what this Blog is about.  A few days after the men's figure skating had concluded, broadcasters Claude Mailhot and Alain Goldberg of RDS, a French-language sports channel in Quebec, mused on air if Weir was unfavorably judged during one of his 'typically flamboyant routines because he wore a semi-see-through pink and black outfit'.

~~
"This may not be politically correct, but do you think he lost points due to his costume and his body language?" Mailhot said.

Goldberg responded that Weir's mannerisms might hurt other men competing in the sport. "They'll think all the boys who skate will end up like him," he said. "It sets a bad example."

The pair joked that Weir should take a gender test like female South African runner Caster Semenya was forced to undergo after stirring up speculation that she was really a man. Mailhot suggested Weir should compete against women.

~~
There is video of this conversation during Episode 109, which is the 2010 Season Finale of  'Be Good Johnny Weir'.  The above remarks ignited a storm of controversary, and though Johnny initially found out about them when Dorothy Hamill came to interview him for 'Access Hollywood' while he was shooting photographs for 'Vanity Fair' magazine; the remarks soon were all over the place.  Dorothy can also be seen in Episode 109 of 'BGJW', and in the show and the actual interview shown on 'Access Hollywood' she is visibly upset and close to tears.  Weir had already addressed some mocking comments made by Australian broadcasters Eddie McGuire and Mick Molloy regarding his sexuality in an interview with an Australian television station when he first found out about the remarks made by Mailhot and Goldberg.

Weir's initial reaction is summed up in his remarks to Hamill, "Every little boy should be so lucky as to turn into me," Weir told Hamill. "And that's all I have to say about that."  And that was all he had to say about it for a while; however he continued to be asked about it, and finally, several days later, and more than six days after the men's figure skating competition had concluded, Weir conducted a press conference to address the comments made about him. 

More than one hundred journalists from around the world attended Johnny Weir's press conference.  He sat on the stage with only his agent Tara Modlin by his side and addressed the comments and took questions from the journalists without the aid of notes or any other assistance.  With pride and dignity he calmly responded and dealt with slurs and comments no one should have to deal with.  A few weeks later while introducing Weir at an Equality California fundraiser, EqCa Executive Director Geoffrey Kors stated that Weir's response to the Quebec broadcasters comments had been 'magical'.  Again, footage from the EqCa event, the press conference, and of the Quebec broadcasters may be seen in Episode 109 of 'Be Good Johnny Weir'.  There is also a shortened version of the press conference, and two sources for watching the entire press conference available.  Both sources may be found in my Blog 'Johnny Weir, A Man Amongst Men'.  The video of the EqCa appearance is found on the same Blog, as is an interview with Weir conducted on the red carpet of the recent GLAAD Manhattan event. 

The entire press conference was twenty-seven minutes long and because of its length I won't address everything said here; however I do highly recommend following the link to my Blog and watching the entire press conference, or at least the two and a half minute long shortened version.  While some people would have been visible angry, and certainly Weir must have been upset; he didn't ask for the broadcasters to be fired, or for any action to be taken against them.  He simply hoped for them to have learned something from what they said and the reaction to it.  I can't imagine anyone reacting as well, and with such class and dignity as Johnny Weir did to these comments.  Despite the fact he doesn't know these men personally, what they said about him had to have hurt.  How could it not?

One of the best things that came out of this ugly mess was this beautiful quote from Johnny Weir (said at the press conference):

'Out of ugly, I think the most important thing to do in life is to make something beautiful."
--Johnny Weir


Though I could go on endlessly (haven't I already?) regarding what Johnny Weir has had to deal with over the years, and even what he's had to deal with since Vancouver; I only have one more thing to mention.  Johnny Weir and Olympic Gold Medalist Evan Lysacek have traded a few barbs over the years, especially the last three years or so.  They are close in age, and basically came up through the ranks of both junior and senior levels of figure skating at the same time.  Johnny Weir has leveled a few digs at Lysacek, and Lysacek has leveled a few digs at Weir.  Neither of them has done it in a vacuum, and with a few exceptions one has often been responding to something the other said. 

However, having said that, a few days ago on August 7, 2010 Evan Lysacek crossed the line.  He said four little words that will forever taint anything he could possibly say afterward for a lot of fans.  In response to a stupid question from a fan on Twitter, who was at the time going by @TahitianFantasy, but who later changed her name to @BahamaEscape and now to @MidnightInFiji (A Springfield), asked Lysacek this question:

'Hey Evan, is Johnny Weir really a guy? hard to tell from the photos I've seen LOL ;)'

To which Evan Lysacek replied: 'verdict is still out'.

At first glance it doesn't seem like much.  However, look again, and think again.  The question from @TahitianFantasy is clearly asking Evan Lysacek whether Weir is really a guy; and on top of that is done in a joking manner.  This Tweet sat on Lysacek's feed for five hours, until he came along and decided to answer it.  Of all the questions he could have picked out to answer, he picked out this one.  Lysacek knows about the hurtful comments made about Weir's gender in Vancouver; not to mention the additional comments made about his sexuality, and he could easily have avoided answering this question altogether, however he chose not to ignore it and deliberately picked it out to respond to.  Because of the comments in Vancouver, and the history between Weir and Lysacek, this can not possibly be written off as a flippant or joking remark.  Questioning Weir's gender was not funny for Mailhot and Goldberg, and it isn't funny for Evan Lysacek either. 

For around twelve hours fans of both Lysacek (who currently has 57,911 Twitter followers) and Weir (who currently has 64,538 Twitter followers) sent Lysacek questions about his Tweet and asked for explanations and hopefully an apology.  Finally they received an answer, but it was't the one we expected.  Lysacek first tried to claim the Tweet was sent from a 'fake account'; a Twitter member who has/had an account EvanIysacek (using a capital I instead of a L).  The EvanIysacek account is a parody, and since the owner quickly responded and distanced himself from the remark this explanation did not wash for Lysacek. At this point he began to claim he was hacked.  This also did not go over well with a lot of fans, and it was actually pretty stupid when all the facts are looked at.  Evan sent the Tweets claiming he was hacked from his 'official' Twitter page, and this was all while the offending Tweet was sitting ON his 'official' Twitter page right underneath his explanations.  'Twittergate' as some fans have come to call it has been documented brilliantly in the Blog Olympic Gold Medalist Shows His True Colors with screen caps and timelines.  If you read this, and I hope you do;  you will probably understand why this was such a big deal and you will also see a mountain of evidence that makes it next to impossible to believe Lysacek's Tweet came from anyplace other than his 'official' account, or that he was hacked.

Some fans are completely convinced Evan Lysacek was genuinely hacked, and others do not see why this was all such a big deal.  It was a big deal because Evan Lysacek answered a stupid, insulting question with a stupid insulting remark knowing what Weir has had to deal with in the past; and then tried to blame it on someone else.  When blaming it on someone else did not work, he then tried to claim he was hacked. What's even worse is that the person who sent the question in the first place did not understand why it was such a big deal.  At first she ignored it, and when people started calling 'her' on it and not just Lysacek she tried to push it off by saying she didn't like Weir.  She thought it was okay to ask an insulting question about him because she 'doesn't support him'.  In addition she has no idea what the difference between gay, gender, sex, trans-gender and so forth is.  She even went as far as to tell me she 'didn't know Weir was gay' when she asked the question.  And that makes it all okay?  Is she seriously telling me she was questioning the gender of a man who she thought was straight?  As if it was okay to question Weir's gender regardless of whether he is gay or straight.

Two or three days after the Tweet Lysacek sent an 'apology' out on his Twitter.  However, even his apology was lame.  Nowhere in his apology did he say 'I apologize...' or 'My apologies...', and he also did not apologize to his own fans, many of whom were deeply hurt by the whole mess.  And no Evan, you're right, you can NOT apologize enough! 

What was Johnny Weir doing while all this was going on?  Nothing.  Once again he responded with class and dignity and said nothing.  He went on about his daily life; working, training, interviewing and made no comment whatsoever because he does have class and dignity.  And good for him!  His wonderful parents Patti and John Weir raised both their children properly, and trust me, it shows!  As my friend 'Binky' said:

‘So he can look at your appalling little tweet, crinkle his nose at its foul aroma, and then step gracefully aside and sail right on past it up there on the high road, choosing not to dignify it with even the slightest bit of his attention.

And if somebody has the bad manners to ask him about it, he can simply smile, shake his head slightly, and respond, with grace and class (look ‘em up…) and a look of genuine pity on his beautiful face…’

Other sources for 'Twittergate' info:

Misfit Mimes Blog: I Don't Evan
Misfit Mimes Blog: Oh I See He Decided to Go With Multi-Part Option D

One last thing; I promised my readers at Fanfiction.net an explanation for why I made a point of mentioning the 'hockey players' in Chapter Twenty-Three of my story 'A Force of Nature: Part II'.  Episode 109 of 'Be Good Johnny Weir' covers the time between the U.S. Nationals Figure Skating Championships in January 2010 and the Vancouver Olympics in February 2010.  It also covers some of the happenings in the first few weeks after the Olympics.  Anyway, near the beginning of the episode Johnny is training at his rink and he is getting ready to leave.  He tells us he has to 'go brave the hockey players'.  He then tells us that 'last week they called me Johnny Queer', and goes on to say they made blow-job gestures at him.  You see him nervously walking out of the rink carrying his skate bag and you can't help wondering if he's worried about another encounter with the dumb jock hockey players.  Until we saw that scene a lot of Johnny's fans hadn't made as much of a personal connection with what he has had to deal with on a daily basis for a number of years now; the slurs, the comments, the gestures, etc.  One of my friends said, "I never thought about him having to deal with it in his personal life."

He does have to deal with it in his personal life, and it's sad.  It's sad for him, it's sad for Billy Van Raaphorst, and it's sad for the millions of other people out there like them.  A lot of people out there should be ashamed of themselves, because all these people deserve better.
~~~~~~~~

For More Information Please Check Out the Following Websites: 

The Advocate Online

GLAAD.org

GLAAD on Twitter

Equality California

Outsports.com

Flameout.org Home Page

Out Magazine

Matthew Shepard:

Matthew Shepard Foundation

A Matthew Shepard Memorial Page

Flameout.org Matthew Shepard Page

Johnny Weir:

Gender Test THIS (Olympic Champion Shows His True Colors)

MisfitMimes Blog: I Don't Evan

Misfit Mimes Blog: Oh I See He Decided to Go With Multi-Part Option D

Misfit Mimes Blog: Guuuuuurrrrrrlll!

Johnny Weir: A Man Amongst Men  (My Blog with video of Vancouver Press Conference)

Outsports.com - Evan Lysacek Questions Johnny Weir's Gender

Johnny Weir's March 2006 Blog  (Describes Some of the Slurs He Has Endured)

Sundance Channel's Johnny Weir Page

French Broadcasters: Johnny Weir Should Take Gender Test

Quebec Gay and Lesbian Council Calls on Broadcasters to Apologize

Complaints Filed Against Homophobic Sportscasters

Billy Van Raaphorst:

Manager Out After Anti-Gay Rant Against Umpire

Ump's Ordeal Shows Sad State of Sports

Minor League Manager's Outburst Toward Gay Ump Was All About Hate

Read More About Manager Bowers

Caps Manager Accused of Anti-Gay Rant